TSTP Solution File: PUZ146^1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : PUZ146^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:50:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 23
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 15 unt; 20 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 22 ( 21 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 20 ( 17 usr; 7 con; 0-6 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 ^ 0 !; 0 ?; 6 :)
% ( 6 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
earthling: $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
hobby: $tType ).
thf(type_def_7,type,
sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
hobby: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
earthling: $tType ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
peter: earthling ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
mary: earthling ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
beer_drinking: hobby ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
belly_dancing: hobby ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
weight_lifting: hobby ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
has_hobby: earthling > hobby > $o ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
peters_hobbies: hobby > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
marys_hobbies: hobby > $o ).
thf(func_def_13,type,
kCOMB:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X0 > X1 > X0 ) ).
thf(func_def_14,type,
bCOMB:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType,X2: $tType] : ( ( X1 > X2 ) > ( X0 > X1 ) > X0 > X2 ) ).
thf(func_def_15,type,
vAND: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
vOR: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
vNOT: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
vEQ:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).
thf(f37,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f33,f35]) ).
thf(f35,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,peters_hobbies,beer_drinking) != $true,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f30,f23]) ).
thf(f23,plain,
peters_hobbies = marys_hobbies,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
peters_hobbies = marys_hobbies,
inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,negated_conjecture,
peters_hobbies != marys_hobbies,
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,conjecture,
peters_hobbies != marys_hobbies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peter_and_mary_have_different_hobbies) ).
thf(f30,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,marys_hobbies,beer_drinking) != $true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,marys_hobbies,beer_drinking) != $true,
inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,marys_hobbies,beer_drinking) != $true,
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
~ vAPP(hobby,$o,marys_hobbies,beer_drinking),
inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,axiom,
~ vAPP(hobby,$o,marys_hobbies,beer_drinking),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mary_does_not_do_beer_drinking) ).
thf(f33,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,peters_hobbies,beer_drinking) = $true,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,peters_hobbies,beer_drinking) = $true,
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f19]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
vAPP(hobby,$o,peters_hobbies,beer_drinking),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,axiom,
vAPP(hobby,$o,peters_hobbies,beer_drinking),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',peter_does_beer_drinking) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : PUZ146^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:04:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (3263)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.38 % (3264)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (3265)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.38 User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.22/0.38 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.38 User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)WARNING: Not using GeneralSplitting currently not compatible with polymorphic/higher-order inputs.
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3263"
% 0.22/0.39 % (3269)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Memory used [KB]: 753
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (3270)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (3263)Success in time 0.023 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------